A Call to Action: We cannot allow a foreign dictator to censor America's fillms #BoycottSony

Sony, behaving like sniveling cowards, succumbed to threats by North Korea and refused to release their movie 'The Interview.' Consumers should give Sony something far more important to fear than the airing of their dirty laundry by a third world dictator. Consumers should boycott all Sony products until they release 'The Interview."

Let me make this clear: I am not a fan of Seth Rogen's style of comedy. This film was not on my "must see" list. However, my unwavering passion for the rights of free speech and free expression requires me to take a stand even for a movie I might ordinarily find distasteful. Let's make clear: Sony has every right to not make films it finds distasteful. It has its own free speech right to not associate with any message it disagrees with.

But let's also make clear that Sony's decision here is not a manner of Sony disagreeing with the content of the movie. Sony reviewed the treatment for the film. It sought out professional opinion from the Rand Corporation. It approved the project, arranged for distribution, and marketed the film. Sony, we can conclude, did not pull the film as a matter of conscience. But then, we already knew that.

Why Doesn't the Media Give the Same Credit to AIDS Dissidents That They Give Climate Change Deniers?

Back in March of 2006 Harper's Magazine published a fifteen page article titled "Out of Control, AIDS and the Corruption of Medical Science (subscription)." The article by Celia Farber laid out the case of so-called "AIDS Dissidents" who posit the notion that HIV does not cause AIDS. She discussed research that purportedly backed up the claim, and even had a prominent researcher vouch for the theory. The New York Times covered the furor over the article here.

The case of AIDS dissidents is at least as strong as the case of climate change deniers. That is to say: not strong at all. We can say, without much consternation, and without provoking a media-made controversy, that HIV does, in fact, cause AIDS, and the "AIDS dissident" theory is a bunch of bunk.

But why does the mainstream media not treat the AIDS dissidents as though they have a legitimate gripe with the state of AIDS science? Why doesn't the mainstream media treat the dissenting scientists as though they have a valid point? Why aren't AIDS dissidents discussed in heroic terms with comparisons to Galileo like climate change deniers by politicians? Mind you, I am not suggesting that the media or politicians take up the cause of AIDS dissent. Such would pose a grave risk to public health, and it is good that, thus far, the media and politicians have ignored the AIDS dissidents.

Elizabeth Warren "Broken You Into Pieces" Speech Energizes Progressives

Last Wednesday we blogged about a provision in the so-called "cromnibus" bill that eradicated the "push-out rule" in Dodd-Frank, giving the big banks, lead by Citigroup a huge victory. Our meme demonstrated Elizabeth Warren's role in pushing back against the provision. Over the weekend she waged a valiant fight against the provision which puts American taxpayers on the hook if, and when, the banks gamble money and lose. Sadly, Warren's efforts failed. The big banks won. Warren did succeed, however, in rallying liberals to the cause. She did not go down without a fight. 

On Friday Night, Elizabeth Warren stepped to the Senate floor to challenge the Citi- provision. The speech she delivered rattled Washington, and some see it as historic. John Nichols at the Nation compared it to William Jennings Bryan's famous "Cross of Gold" speech. And it has Michael Tomasky calling Warren "the most powerful Democrat in America" saying "there's no other Democrat with that kind of following." The Huffington Post said her speech was a  barn-burner, and "electrifying," saying the speech could make her the next president. 

Money IS Influence: The Koch Brothers, Universities, and Public Broadcasting

Does money buy influence in politics? Of course it does. You know that. I know that. We all know that. When it comes to buying influence nobody does it quite like the Koch Brothers. Since the infamous Citizens United ruling by the Supreme Court that allowed unlimited spending in elections by anyone through so-called Super Pacs, the Koch brothers have become the most influential donors of the far right.

In 2012, for example, they spent at least $60 million in an effort to unseat President Obama. Most of that was funneled through Super Pacs that don't have to disclose their donors. So, we don't know the precise number. This year, the Kochs were bigger spenders. According to the National Journal, they spent $100 million in their successful bid to win the US Senate for Republicans.

Politics is one thing. Most people are so convinced that both major parties are so corrupt, and that the game is and has always been rigged by big money donors that even this kind of prodigious spending is often met with numb shrugs. What many in the public don't pay as much attention to is how much big donors influence our universities. Earlier this year, under pressure from big donors the University Illinois fired Steven Salaita for tweets he made that criticized the State of Israel for its treatment of Palestinians. But that is almost small potatoes compared to the influence the Koch Brothers want at universities accross the country. The most notable example is at Florida State.

Banksters, GOP Plot to Trigger Another Economic Meltdown

Remember the 2008 econmic meltdown? Well, of course you do! You lost your job, your home, your 401k, and your child's college fund as a result. If you are a Tea Partier you probably blame it on Obama even though Obama didn't take office until 2009. If, instead, you are a rational human being, by now you know that a wildly un-regulated financial sector gambled with your money in high-risk investments because GET RICH QUICK WITH OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY is only a risk for the other people. This cavalier behavior caused the greatest economic collapse since the Great Depression.

You voted for Obama because you wanted this fixed and wanted him to do what was neccesary to prevent the banksters from being able to do this again. In July of 2010, President Obama signed landmark legislation called Dodd-Frank. It was designed to bring some regulation to the Wild West Salloon Brawl known as Wall Street.

More Proof that Obamacare is Working!

As we already pointed out, Obamacare is working on every front.  Over 27 million have gained coverage through the law, and a million more have signed up during the first month of this enrollment  period. Hospital accidents are down, and so is healthcare spending. The reduction in healthcare spending over the last few years lead the CBO to reduce its estimate of Medicare spending into the next decade, and expanded the lifespan of the Medicare trust fund.

And all this has occurred while slowing the cost of premiums. And one of the reasons premiums are being kept in check? A provision of the law called the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR). This provision is designed to force insurers to reduce adminstration costs, which are much higher in the private sector than public insurance programs like Medicare, or send rebates to customers. MLR requires health insurers to spend at least 80% of their premium revenue on patient care. Any amount below that and insurers must send rebate checks to their customers.

Torture Report: America, Confession is Not Enough

Imagine a young Catholic boy who bullied a classmate. Now, imagine the same boy going to the confessional booth on Saturday to confess this sin to the priest. Confession is good for the soul, they say. It is really big of you to admit your wrongdoing. But, as those of us raised Catholic know, confession is not enough. It must be followed by an act of contrition. The "Hail Marys," of course. But also the priest is likely to instruct the boy to apologize to the classmate he bullied, not only must he promise to the boy to never do it again, he must be willing to accept whatever punishment that the bullying necessitates. Confession is good for the soul, but the complete confession, and true remorse comes with the willingness, and even desire, to be held accountable.

Today, the United States Senate released its report on a five-year-long investigation into the CIA's "Enhanced Interrogation" program. The details are gruesome, disgusting, and sound like something from the twisted mind of a depraved sociopathic sadist. There are the things we were already aware of: waterboarding, simulated drowning, stress positions, sleep deprivation, and now we find out about another perverse torture technique: rectal feeding.

At one CIA detention facility known as Cobalt, detainees were forced to stand on broken feet and legs. Another detainees' bullet wound was allowed to get infected. Another practice called "rectal feeding" was forced on prisoners without any medical need. This practice is not used in the United States for medical purposes today. Making matters worse, more than one-in-five detainees were innocent of any crime.